First Research

Source : https://www.sciencenews.org/article/we-robot-what-real-life-machines-can-and-can%E2%80%99t-do
:http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/robot-learning/
:http://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/events/hotseat/dylan_position.pdf
My topic
 : human soldiers are more effective than military robots.
What I hope to learn from this source
 : What is something robot can not follow human
Notes :

Isn’t it hard to mimic what was created by billions of years of evolution?
Yes, at both levels. Mimicking evolution in the physical manifestation is hard. What tends to happen is natural systems have lots of little joints, lots of little muscles which pull and tug and make the motion. And if you start introducing that many joints and that many motors in a synthetic thing, your cost goes up exponentially as complexity keeps growing. At the same time, the reliability goes down. If any single joint fails, your whole thing is going to fail. So that makes it very hard to mimic nature.

On the brain side of things, it is also very, very hard. A lot of us teach ourselves how to reason, how to think, how to analyze new information and make sense of it. This has been very difficult for robots to be able to do. So people will try to program different contexts and different scenarios for what a robot should do, but that way of doing it is simply not scalable. You don’t have enough time and manpower to code up all the possible scenarios that a robot would encounter and what it should be doing. People have made very small steps toward reasoning and learning, but in general robots do not yet know how to learn.

Final Thoughts
:  mimicking evolution in the physical manifestation is hard.
  On the brain side of things,
  how to reason, how to think, how to analyze new information and make sense of it.